Special
Publication

Impact on System Performance

For operations managers, the impact of migration on
system reliability is very important.

What will be the impact on system fade margin and
availability if the existing a 2-GHz system, with fixed
path lengths, is switched to the 6.5-GHz band?
Will antenna tower heights have to be changed?


In this section, we will answer these questions related
to fade margin, availability and path obstruction clear-
ance.

Fade Margin and Availability

Questions related to fade margin and availability are
best answered by reviewing an example, single-hop,
path calculation. For illustration purposes, let's assume
that the hop will be migrating from 1920 MHz to 6650
MHz and has a fixed length of 20 miles. An 8-foot
diameter antenna will be used at each end of the hop
for both the 2-GHz and the 6.5-GHz systems. Other
parameters needed for path calculations, such as trans-
mission line loss, transmitter power, receiver threshold,
are noted in Figure 9.

Figure 9 - System Performance, Fade Margin
and Availability - System Parameters



Antennas 8-ft Diameter
Antenna Gain 31.2 dBi at 1920 MHz
42.3 dBi at 6650 MHz
Antenna Height 150 ft AGL
Transmission Line Loss
HJ5-50 (7/8" Coax)

175 ft @ 1.85 dB/100 ft:
3.24 dB
EWP63 (Elliptical
Waveguide)
175 ft @ 1.37 dB/100 ft:
2.40 dB
Path Length 20 miles
Transmitter Output Power + 33 dBm*
Receiver Threshold -80 dBm*
Path Roughness Average
Field Margin 1 dB

* Digital RF equipment parameters will differ.

Figure 10 displays the path calculation results for opera-
tion at both 1920 and 6650 MHz. These calculations
reveal that the fade margin at 6650 MHz increases by


13.1 dB compared with the fade margin of the original
1920 MHz system. Associated with this increased fade
margin is an improvement in system availability from
99.999847% (48.7 seconds/year outage) to
99.999972% (8.2 seconds/year outage).

Figure 10 - System Performance, Fade Margin
and Availability - 20-Mile Path


1920 MHz6650 MHz
Free Space Loss128.3 dB139.1 dBm
RSL-40.4 dBm-27.3 dBm
Fade Margin36.9 dB52.7 dB
Availability99.999847%99.999972%
Outage48.4 sec/year8.2 sec/year


The reason for this performance improvement is that
the total antenna gain is increasing by a factor of
40*Log (frequency) where the path loss is increasing by
only 20*Log (frequency). The net result is an increase
in fade margin and an improvement in system availabil-
ity.

Please note that this is only an example and that each
system should be evaluated. In some cases, where an
existing analog system is upgraded to digital, space
diversity may be required to achieve the desired system
Bit-Error-Rate (BER) performance. Remember that addi-
tional antennas and transmission lines will create added
tower wind loading.

Obstruction Clearance (Fresnel Zone Clearance)

When migrating, you should also analyze the clearance
between your path and obstructions along the path. In
some situations, excessive clearance may cause degrad-
ed system performance.

The required antenna height is based on path profile and
clearance from obstructions. The criterion used to deter-
mine the required antenna height is the first Fresnel
zone. Reflections of signal from obstructions that are
near the first, or other odd-numbered Fresnel zone bound-
ary(ies) could negatively impact performance. Fresnel
zone calculations are frequency dependent. The highter
the frequency, the smaller the Fresnel zone.



Andrew Corporation
10500 W. 153rd Street Orland Park, IL U.S.A. 60462

PR-20-01 12 March 1993

Page 6 of 11 -- Page 7 of 11 -- Page 8 of 11